Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Historical dates
TalkBack > > Schools
mrsuwe
I'm looking for some information about the American Revolution. My 8th grader's History teacher asked the class when the Revolution started, a student answered 1776, and her response was "close, it was 1771". I've spent some time online researching it, besides the history classes I've taken, and the date 1771 never comes up. Anyone out there know why 1771 would be the correct date, or is this teacher spewing incorrect facts?
fishbulb
I've always thought that the traditional "beginning" of the Revolutionary War was April 19, 1775, when British and Minutemen exchanged fire in Lexington, Massachusetts.

Some say that Crispus Attucks was the "first casualty" of the Revolution, as he is traditionally believed to be the first person killed at the Boston Massacre. That was March 5, 1770.

Either way, nothing much happened in 1771 that could be pinpointed as the start of the war.
Kate
QUOTE(eurytopic @ Sep 2 2005, 07:25 PM)
Some say that Crispus Attucks was the "first casualty" of the Revolution, as he is traditionally believed to be the first person killed at the Boston Massacre.  That was March 5, 1770.
[right][snapback]120634[/snapback][/right]

I always thought the Boston Tea Party got the Revolution going:

http://campus.northpark.edu/history/WebChr...A/TeaParty.html

QUOTE
On December 16, 1773, American patriots dressed as Mohawk Indians boarded the vessels of the East Indian Company docked in the Boston harbor and dumped all the tea that was on the three ships into the ocean. They emptied 342 chests of tea which was valued at more than 10,000 pounds. This event became known as the "Boston Tea Party."

The Boston Tea Party was a reaction to the Tea Act of 1773 that was passed by Parliament to save the British East India Company from bankruptcy. The Tea Act essentially eliminated all taxes on tea except the three pence Townshend tax. More importantly, it offered Americans tea at a lower price than that of the colonial smugglers. Hence, the British East Indian Company would be saved from bankruptcy, the colonial smugglers would be out of business, and the principle of parliamentary taxation would be upheld.

However, there were rumors that the Tea Act created an illegal monopoly so resistance to the importation of tea was encouraged throughout the colonies. If the people bought from the East India Company, it would give that company a monopoly of the American tea trade and establish the right of Parliament to raise a colonial revenue by means of port duties. Since the patriots believed that the cheap price of tea would be too much of a temptation to the people, the patriots took steps to maneuver Britain into a difficult position.

The patriots decided to reject tea shipments and they demanded that tea ships be permitted to return to England without paying the duty required by law. Over 5,000 townspeople of Boston and surrounding towns gathered at Old South Meeting House to plead with the governor to send the ships back to England. However, Governor Hutchinson refused and it was that night, December 16, that sixty men dressed as Mohawk Indians and went over to the Boston harbor. There they boarded the three ships of the East India Company and dumped over 10,000 pounds of tea into the Boston harbor. Parliament was furious and retaliated by passing the Coercive Acts, one of which closed the Boston harbor. Thus, the Boston Tea Party marked the beginning of violence in the dispute between mother country and colonies.

Kate
eury - it looks like you're correct:

http://campus.northpark.edu/history/WebChr...onMassacre.html

QUOTE
The "Boston Massacre" as it is called, was really not a massacre in the sense that a lot of people were slaughtered (because only five people were killed), it was a massacre in the sense that the British government's authority was not going to be tolerated. This incident marked the beginning of the end for England and its presence in the United States of America.

On October 1, 1768 a group of British regulars arrived in Boston, MA. to maintain order. The civilians reacted to the redcoats like they were invaders by taunting them through name calling, spitting, and fighting. The people of Boston had gained control of the reigns of power and prevented the soldiers from carrying out their duties. During the next eighteen months tension mounted between the two sides.

On March 5, 1770 the Twenty-Ninth Regiment came to the relief of the Eighth on duty at the Customs House on King (now State) Street. The soldiers, led by Captain Thomas Preston, were met by a large and taunting crowd of civilians. Captain Preston was unable to disperse the crowd and as they chanted "Fire and be damned" he ordered his troops "Don't Fire!" With all the commotion the soldiers probably did not hear his orders and they opened fire on the crowd killing three men instantly and another two who died later.

Seven months later, in October of 1770, Captain Preston was tried for murder in a Boston courtroom. He was defended by John Adams and Robert Auchmuty and assisted by Josiah Quincy Jr. Captain Preston was acquitted by a Boston jury. It was never satisfactory explained why the radicals Adams and Quincy represented Preston, and later the soldiers, although some surviving documents suggest that the jury in Preston's case was "packed." When the soldiers case came to trial soon after they were defended by Adams, Quincy, and Sampson Salter Blowers. The jurors in their case came from outside of Boston and they won acquittals a month after the trial began.

user posted image
Hope
I sure would like to know what that teacher was talking about because there are no timelines available (that I have found) to show that anything happened in 1771 let alone the start of the war.
LicenseForMayhem
Here's an article claiming the "first blood shed in the American Revolution" happened on May 16, 1771, in the Battle of Alamance. And guess what! It happened in North Carolina, not in New England. See what you think--but first, grab a sharp pencil so you can take notes and jab yourself to stay awake.

http://www.tamu.edu/ccbn/dewitt/mckstmerreg6.htm

Edited to add: If the Battle of Alamance is the 1771 event to which the teacher refers, perhaps the date 1771 should be qualified by saying it represents the first formal military engagement of what came to be known as the Revolution.

Edited again to add: Further research shows the Battle of Alamance lasted two hours. But there is a granite memorial for it, LOL. smile.gif
fishbulb
Good digging, Nona. More background here. I doubt that the so-called "War of Regulation" was the only such skirmish of those years that led up to the Revolutionary War itself.

I still think that the war actually began in 1775. mrsuwe, this might be a fun experiment: Spend an hour or two this weekend studying the War of Regulation with your eighth-grader, and then have your kid quiz the teacher about it on Tuesday. I have a persistent hunch that the teacher didn't mean to say 1771.

[edit: typo]
LicenseForMayhem
But...but...it must be an important event if there's a monument for it! rolleyes.gif

mrsuwe
Thanks everyone for your digging. I'll let you know if the teacher meant 1771 or was mistaken.
LicenseForMayhem
QUOTE(mrsuwe @ Sep 4 2005, 07:37 PM)
Thanks everyone for your digging. I'll let you know if the teacher meant 1771 or was mistaken.
[right][snapback]120871[/snapback][/right]

I'll be interested to see what the answer is.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.