Sign In
Register
Help
Bush kept us safe
#1
- News Robot
-
- Posts: 5,607
- Joined: 07-November 03
Posted 27 January 2009 - 04:42 PM
| QUOTE |
| Bush kept us safe By 2009-01-27 15:42:00 Lancaster New Era Editor, New Era: When our now ex-president, Mr. Bush, took office in 2001, the Democrats left the beholdings in Washington a mess. |
Post your thoughts and comments about this article.
MultiQuote
#2
- Grand Poobah
-
- Posts: 2,620
- Joined: 10-January 07
Posted 27 January 2009 - 04:50 PM
QUOTE (Lancaster Online @ Jan 27 2009, 03:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Post your thoughts and comments about this article.
He kept us safe for eight years? Too easy.
Nobody has fun like people.
#3
- Grand Poobah
-
- Posts: 1,773
- Joined: 23-November 08
Posted 27 January 2009 - 04:56 PM
QUOTE (Lancaster Online @ Jan 27 2009, 03:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Post your thoughts and comments about this article.
America's Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines (and Coasties too) kept us safe. Our municipal police, firefighters and EMTs kept us safe. George Bush chose to invade a country that was no threat to us resulting in the deaths of 4236 service men and women.
To hell with you Mr. Smith.
#4
- Member
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: 14-January 09
Posted 27 January 2009 - 04:58 PM
He was also left with a budget SURPLUS and the economy was nowhere near where it is 8 years later.....AND MANY other Presidents kept us "safe" for 8 years or better...This claim has been beaten to death.......big deal...He ALLOWED an opportunity for us to be Attacked!!!
#5
- a voice crying in the wilderness
-
- Posts: 9,953
- Joined: 09-July 06
Posted 27 January 2009 - 05:14 PM
i wonder if the letter writer knows that nice woman who is also from mountville who kept referring to our president as a monkey because he is somewhat dark skinned?
i certainly agree that the bush boy did a heckuva job, being that we were only attacked once while he vacationed.
see you can loaf and only be attacked once. who sez the prez didn't deserve all that time off?
i certainly agree that the bush boy did a heckuva job, being that we were only attacked once while he vacationed.
see you can loaf and only be attacked once. who sez the prez didn't deserve all that time off?
#6
- Talkback Addict
-
- Posts: 1,445
- Joined: 22-October 01
Posted 27 January 2009 - 05:15 PM
QUOTE (wiseone @ Jan 27 2009, 03:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
He was also left with a budget SURPLUS and the economy was nowhere near where it is 8 years later.....AND MANY other Presidents kept us "safe" for 8 years or better...This claim has been beaten to death.......big deal...He ALLOWED an opportunity for us to be Attacked!!!
budget surplus? must I go over this again? it must be true, say anything long enough and loud enough (and throw up some Washington double-speak and smoke & mirrors) and people will believe it.
#7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: 04-August 08
Posted 27 January 2009 - 05:18 PM
QUOTE (avgwhiteguy @ Jan 27 2009, 05:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
America's Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines (and Coasties too) kept us safe. Our municipal police, firefighters and EMTs kept us safe. George Bush chose to invade a country that was no threat to us resulting in the deaths of 4236 service men and women.
To hell with you Mr. Smith.
To hell with you Mr. Smith.
As for you & wiseguy, you can have the 9/11 terrorist detainees from gitmo come live in your house. You better check your stats because I believe there were more service men & women that died during Clinton's era & we weren't even involved in war??? GO FIGURE
Here's the link because I know you will deny it Military losses, 1980 through 2006 (ttp://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf)
This post has been edited by bogada04: 27 January 2009 - 05:23 PM
It is what it is
#8
- Talkback Addict
-
- Posts: 1,238
- Joined: 07-December 08
Posted 27 January 2009 - 05:25 PM
QUOTE (bogada04 @ Jan 27 2009, 05:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
As for you & wiseguy, you can have the 9/11 terrorist detainees from gitmo come live in your house.
Why would they be placed in our houses? Someone is watching a little too much Fox News now. They would be placed in a Military prision just like other military prisioners. They would be tried in a war crimes court, not some double secret court that Bush and Co. made up.
#9
- concerned citizen
-
- Posts: 14,664
- Joined: 22-November 04
Posted 27 January 2009 - 07:28 PM
QUOTE (P. Floyd @ Jan 27 2009, 04:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
budget surplus? must I go over this again? it must be true, say anything long enough and loud enough (and throw up some Washington double-speak and smoke & mirrors) and people will believe it.
http://fms.treas.gov/mts/mts0900.pdf
QUOTE (US Treasury Web Site)
For Fiscal Year 2000 Through September 30, 2000, and Other Periods
Highlight
This issue includes the final budget results and details a surplus of $237.0 billion for Fiscal Year 2000.
Highlight
This issue includes the final budget results and details a surplus of $237.0 billion for Fiscal Year 2000.
Denial is not a river in Egypt.
"But you must remember, my fellow-citizens, that eternal vigilance by the people is the price of liberty, and that you must pay the price if you wish to secure the blessing."
- Andrew Jackson, in his Farewell Address, 1837
- Andrew Jackson, in his Farewell Address, 1837
#10
- Hello! Is this thing on?
-
- Posts: 6,483
- Joined: 04-November 04
Posted 28 January 2009 - 11:01 AM
QUOTE
Telephone lines were ripped out of the walls, computers were all messed up. Some people remember those things.
You forgot that the Clintons stole the silverware off Air Force One and had Vince Foster and a host of others killed.
Another myth like the one that republicans are good at national security.
"Son, fat and stupid is no way to go through life."
Vernon Wormer.
Vernon Wormer.
#12
- Grand Poobah
-
- Posts: 2,089
- Joined: 18-January 05
Posted 28 January 2009 - 11:35 AM
My guess is that if we would have been attacked again in the U.S. after 9/11 under bush's watch, we be getting 2-3 inches of liberal indignation of accumulation outside. We would be less safe.
No attacks in the minds of libs = the same as being attacked.
Fuzzy math?
No attacks in the minds of libs = the same as being attacked.
Fuzzy math?
[center] [/center]
#14
- Member
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: 14-January 09
Posted 28 January 2009 - 11:55 AM
QUOTE (P. Floyd @ Jan 27 2009, 05:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
budget surplus? must I go over this again? it must be true, say anything long enough and loud enough (and throw up some Washington double-speak and smoke & mirrors) and people will believe it.
you gotta be a die hard Repugnican....there was a budget surplus....denial is big with your party
#15
- Member
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: 14-January 09
Posted 28 January 2009 - 12:00 PM
QUOTE (bogada04 @ Jan 27 2009, 05:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
As for you & wiseguy, you can have the 9/11 terrorist detainees from gitmo come live in your house. You better check your stats because I believe there were more service men & women that died during Clinton's era & we weren't even involved in war??? GO FIGURE
Here's the link because I know you will deny it Military losses, 1980 through 2006 (ttp://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf)
Here's the link because I know you will deny it Military losses, 1980 through 2006 (ttp://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf)
1980???...wasn't Reagan in office??? and then Bush Sr.??? before Clinton.. slim down your research just for the Clinton era for more of a comparison
