TalkBack

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 5 farmers may face lawsuits
Lancaster Online
post Nov 18 2009, 11:59 AM
Post #1


News Robot
Group Icon

Group: Article Robot
Posts: 5,607
Joined: 7-November 03
From: Lancaster Newspapers
Member No.: 1,075



QUOTE
5 farmers may face lawsuits
By AD CRABLE
2009-11-18 10:59:00
Intelligencer Journal
Lancaster New Era

PennFuture, a statewide environmental group, is threatening to sue five Solanco farmers, alleging they are polluting local streams with soil and manure runoff in violation of state laws.


Post your thoughts and comments about this article.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nicknack
post Nov 18 2009, 12:41 PM
Post #2


Grand Poobah
*****

Group: Senior Members x 2
Posts: 2,229
Joined: 19-February 09
Member No.: 11,945



Let me guess; Amish or Mennonite? Like when they operate puppy mill's Yeah, they "May face lawsuits", but nothing's gonna come of it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
terry_l
post Nov 18 2009, 12:49 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 422
Joined: 13-August 08
Member No.: 10,265



If this lawsuit goes through, who benefits from it? Will it go towards the Chesapeake Bay Foundation or go towards this environmental group for who knows what?

My contention has been, if a borough Like Manheim can charge residents to counter polluting the bay in a town upstream this far, why can't they go after the irresponsible farmers and industries who are far more a factor than a family of four...doing exactly what to polute the bay?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SPAYME
post Nov 19 2009, 05:26 PM
Post #4


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 28
Joined: 17-September 07
Member No.: 8,302



Bravo to this group. Waiting for the officials to do something about the pollution isn't gonig to work. Not only will the officials not do anything about it they don't even admit to it. A lawsuit is the only thing that works. Once these suits get started, its time to go after the breeders who are allowing the ground to be polluted, their runoff is much worse than that of chickens and other farm animals.

Again bravo, let the suits begin.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
justplainjoe
post Nov 19 2009, 05:42 PM
Post #5


a voice crying in the wilderness
*****

Group: Senior Members x 2
Posts: 9,610
Joined: 9-July 06
Member No.: 5,729



why don't they go after the millionaire corporate farmers , those whose massive operations cause far more pollution instead of picking on some plain farmers scratching out a living.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
spaylady
post Nov 19 2009, 08:21 PM
Post #6


Grand Poobah
*****

Group: Senior Members x 2
Posts: 2,748
Joined: 21-September 08
Member No.: 10,568



QUOTE (SPAYME @ Nov 19 2009, 05:26 PM) *
Bravo to this group. Waiting for the officials to do something about the pollution isn't gonig to work. Not only will the officials not do anything about it they don't even admit to it. A lawsuit is the only thing that works. Once these suits get started, its time to go after the breeders who are allowing the ground to be polluted, their runoff is much worse than that of chickens and other farm animals.

Again bravo, let the suits begin.


I 2nd that bravo . Its about time someone enforced the laws with people who have no concern for the environment; just money.

There are WATER ISSUES they need to pay concern to. In some ways no different than poisoning someone if you let waste run into waterways.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
terry_l
post Nov 19 2009, 08:26 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 422
Joined: 13-August 08
Member No.: 10,265



QUOTE (spaylady @ Nov 19 2009, 08:21 PM) *
I 2nd that bravo . Its about time someone enforced the laws with people who have no concern for the environment; just money.


OK, which side are you actually referring to here? Again, who's pockets would be added to if these lawsuits go through? Unless the money goes for the cause they are trying to represent, the intentions don't appear to be genuine. The article leaves that bit of information out.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
spaylady
post Nov 19 2009, 09:19 PM
Post #8


Grand Poobah
*****

Group: Senior Members x 2
Posts: 2,748
Joined: 21-September 08
Member No.: 10,568



QUOTE (terry_l @ Nov 19 2009, 09:26 PM) *
OK, which side are you actually referring to here? Again, who's pockets would be added to if these lawsuits go through? Unless the money goes for the cause they are trying to represent, the intentions don't appear to be genuine. The article leaves that bit of information out.



Im against farmers ignoring run off issues, polluting the environment. That costs us more in the end than any lawsuit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lanzate
post Nov 19 2009, 09:58 PM
Post #9


Grand Poobah
*****

Group: Senior Members x 2
Posts: 1,644
Joined: 23-February 05
From: west earl township
Member No.: 2,528



QUOTE (terry_l @ Nov 19 2009, 08:26 PM) *
OK, which side are you actually referring to here? Again, who's pockets would be added to if these lawsuits go through? Unless the money goes for the cause they are trying to represent, the intentions don't appear to be genuine. The article leaves that bit of information out.


No one is getting blood from a dairy farmer now. My guess is that this is more of a threat to get things moving than anything else. There really is a problem, there just seems to be a strong difference of opinion on how we go about fixing it. What is more of a news story is what is happening to a group of farmers south of intercourse on Watson Run. EPA is about to show their hand on what used to be a local and state issue.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 11:04 PM