Challenging Charles Darwin's science
#1
Posted 21 October 2009 - 08:38 AM
| QUOTE |
| Challenging Charles Darwin's science By 2009-10-21 08:38:00 Intelligencer Journal Lancaster New Era To the Editors: On Oct. 6, columnist Jeff Hawkes wrote a refresher on the persecution of Galileo and compared it to today's creation debate: "How is denial of evolution by evangelical Christian politicians all that different than a denial of the Holocaust by Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad?" |
Post your thoughts and comments about this article.
#2
Posted 21 October 2009 - 10:10 AM
Darwin predicted some sort of hereditary mechanism would demonstrate that humans were related to other animals. The discovery of DNA validates the prediction and supports the theory.
#3
Posted 21 October 2009 - 10:15 AM
And the monkeys and apes roaming the earth CHOSE NOT TO EVOLVE? I wonder why they would choose to not evolve.
#4
Posted 21 October 2009 - 10:26 AM
Wrong, they did evolve and continue to evolve. Just like any other species.
Later...Shawn
#5
Posted 21 October 2009 - 11:13 AM
...maybe because they oppose Obama's socialist agenda?
- Emile Zola
#6
Posted 21 October 2009 - 01:56 PM
Ehhhh. A theory based not on 150-year-old science but on 150+ years of science. No pun intended but most folks understand that scientific theories evolve as new discoveries present themselves. Science is not static. The modern evolutionary synthesis provides a good example.
In scripture, creation is given as a visible proof of God, to the extent that people will be held accountable at the judgment because of the very fact that the evidence of God's work was all around them.
If evolution does not occur, how does one explain that current biodiversity estimates range between 5-30 million species. If evolution does not occur and you just consider the number of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and insects, Noah's ark needed to house 2,019,622 paired creatures (that is, if you hold to a literal interpretation of the Flood story).
http://www.currentre...ber-species.php
http://www.eoearth.o...le/biodiversity
And every day the boy would come and he would gather her leaves and make them into crowns and play king of the forest.
He would climb up her trunk and swing from her branches and eat apples.
And they would play hide-and-go-seek.
And when he was tired, he would sleep in her shade.
And the boy loved the tree ... very much.
And the tree was happy. . . . " (Shel Silverstein-The Giving Tree)
GO BLEU, BLANC, ET ROUGE!!!
Quit complaining. Get off your butt and do something about it.
--Me--
#7
Posted 21 October 2009 - 02:11 PM
Later...Shawn
And there are monkies still because?
They evolved into a different type of monkey - Oh - I get it - right.
#8
Posted 21 October 2009 - 02:17 PM
They evolved into a different type of monkey - Oh - I get it - right.
For the same reason there are still humans. Evolution does not mean that one species all of a sudden turns into another species. It is all about genetics, genetic mutations, and genetic pairings. I'm not exactly sure what your point is. Perhaps you don't understand Darwin's theories on evolution. I don't think Darwin ever suggested that "Monkeys turned into Humans". If you think he did, perhaps you could cite a reference. I think one of the theories out there is that humans developed, through evolution, as an offshoot of primates. Its possible that some primates were exposed to something that mutated their genes, they mated, so on and so on until we have the modern day human. The primates that did not have the mutated genes did continued on their primate path of evolution to what they are today.
Later...Shawn
#9
Posted 21 October 2009 - 02:22 PM
Dilbert writes a poem and presents it to Dogbert:
DOGBERT: I once read that given infinite time, a thousand monkeys with typewriters would eventually write the complete works of Shakespeare.
Jeff Hawkes: But what about my column?
DOGBERT: Three monkeys, ten minutes.Scott Adams, Dilbert comic strip, 15 May 1989.
Original content Edited. Sorry
#10
Posted 21 October 2009 - 04:04 PM
Some will take issue with grieker but I envy him. He will catch influenza just once in his life.
#11
Posted 21 October 2009 - 04:08 PM
The empirical evidence in support of evolutionary theory is simply astounding. Common ancestors in the taxonomy of life which have been predicted by it have been later discovered, matching the prediction. No theory in biology has had such a tremendously positive impact, nor proven as empirically correct, as evolutionary theory.
This post has been edited by localyokel123: 21 October 2009 - 04:09 PM
#12
Posted 21 October 2009 - 04:14 PM
They are just as evolved as you are. Perhaps, more so...
#13
Posted 21 October 2009 - 04:48 PM
Oh Josie, I've been around the block many more times than you - I unlike you, will probably not die like a pig.
#14
Posted 21 October 2009 - 05:10 PM
Be careful JoeDog, Grieker is sharpening a stick at both ends.
- Emile Zola
#15
Posted 21 October 2009 - 05:21 PM







Sign In
Register
Help
MultiQuote




